| + sl (~sl@104-59-85-219.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net) | 00:21 | |
| - sbates (QUIT: Ping timeout: 252 seconds) (sid451432@id-451432.ilkley.irccloud.com) | 00:41 | |
| - liquorice (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (sid267884@id-267884.uxbridge.irccloud.com) | 00:41 | |
| + sbates (sid451432@id-451432.ilkley.irccloud.com) | 00:41 | |
| + liquorice (sid267884@id-267884.uxbridge.irccloud.com) | 00:42 | |
| - scops (QUIT: Ping timeout: 252 seconds) (~scopstchn@2001:470:69fc:105::8da) | 00:43 | |
| - ephase (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 3.4) (~ephase@2a0d:e487:37f:f83f:8657:4491:e857:fd50) | 00:49 | |
| + scops (~scopstchn@2001:470:69fc:105::8da) | 00:56 | |
| - mtm (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~mtm@c-73-27-62-116.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) | 01:03 | |
| - macc24 (QUIT: Ping timeout: 272 seconds) (~macc24@cadmium/maintainer/macc24) | 01:16 | |
| + macc24 (~macc24@83.24.229.182.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl) | 01:27 | |
| - Christoph_ (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Christoph@p54bf6488.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | 01:30 | |
| - oomono (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid328183@id-328183.tinside.irccloud.com) | 02:18 | |
| + mtm (~mtm@c-73-27-62-116.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) | 03:08 | |
| - vagrantc (QUIT: Quit: leaving) (~vagrant@2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:20) | 04:08 | |
| + robin (~robin@user/terpri) | 05:33 | |
| - sundog (QUIT: Ping timeout: 240 seconds) (~sundog@reclaim.technology) | 06:41 | |
| + sundog (~sundog@reclaim.technology) | 06:41 | |
| - smoothduck (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (sid37490@id-37490.helmsley.irccloud.com) | 07:05 | |
| - robin (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~robin@user/terpri) | 07:49 | |
| + robin (~robin@user/terpri) | 07:50 | |
| - robin (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~robin@user/terpri) | 08:14 | |
| - bluerise (QUIT: Quit: brb) (~bluerise@user/bluerise) | 08:40 | |
| - erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 240 seconds) (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 08:54 | |
| + robin (~robin@user/terpri) | 09:22 | |
| - macc24 (QUIT: Changing host) (~macc24@83.24.229.182.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl) | 09:30 | |
| + macc24 (~macc24@cadmium/maintainer/macc24) | 09:30 | |
| - jryans (QUIT: Quit: You have been kicked for being idle) (~jryans@2001:470:69fc:105::1d) | 10:00 | |
| + erlehmann (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 10:29 | |
| + oomono (uid328183@id-328183.tinside.irccloud.com) | 10:39 | |
| + bluerise (~bluerise@user/bluerise) | 10:56 | |
| + Christoph_ (~Christoph@p4fe73da3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | 11:02 | |
| + MajorBiscuit (~MajorBisc@c-001-015-055.client.tudelft.eduvpn.nl) | 11:06 | |
| - Christoph_ (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Christoph@p4fe73da3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | 11:27 | |
| + Christoph_ (~Christoph@p4fe73da3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) | 11:56 | |
| - erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 240 seconds) (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 12:54 | |
| + erlehmann (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 13:01 | |
| - mtm (QUIT: Ping timeout: 272 seconds) (~mtm@c-73-27-62-116.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) | 13:04 | |
| - bkeys (QUIT: Quit: With every step we take, danger will follow closely) (~Thunderbi@66.115.189.236) | 14:51 | |
| + bkeys (~Thunderbi@66.115.189.236) | 14:52 | |
| + mtm (~mtm@c-73-27-62-116.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) | 15:09 | |
| + mjw (~mjw_@2001:1c06:2488:1400:9e5c:8eff:fe8f:a440) | 16:04 | |
| piroko | friend of mine gave me a viewsonic p95f+B a few months ago. I have it hooked up to a MiSTer. completely changes the feel of the cores | 16:11 |
|---|---|---|
| - swivel (QUIT: Quit: Lost terminal) (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com) | 16:28 | |
| + swivel (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com) | 16:52 | |
| - erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 17:15 | |
| + erlehmann (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 17:24 | |
| - mrus (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~mrus@gateway/tor-sasl/mrus) | 17:27 | |
| - GNUmoon (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 17:27 | |
| + mrus (~mrus@gateway/tor-sasl/mrus) | 17:28 | |
| + GNUmoon (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 17:28 | |
| Boostisbetter | Oh yeah, I remember Viewsonic used to be consider one of the premium CRT manufactureres. | 17:50 |
| Boostisbetter | Oh yeah, I remember Viewsonic used to be consider one of the premium CRT manufacturers. | 17:51 |
| + vagrantc (~vagrant@2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:20) | 17:53 | |
| kfx | as someone who lived through that era, the only thing I miss about CRTs is the pixel density. every other aspect of those things fucken sucked | 18:03 |
| Boostisbetter | haha, yeah, but don't you miss being able to get a CRT tan? | 18:07 |
| Boostisbetter | crank the brightness up and cook | 18:07 |
| - mjw (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~mjw_@2001:1c06:2488:1400:9e5c:8eff:fe8f:a440) | 18:11 | |
| kfx | uhh | 18:16 |
| kfx | when I Was a kid a "CRT tan" was an ironic phrase because computer nerds were pallid, waxy things | 18:16 |
| Boostisbetter | yeah that is the joke | 18:17 |
| Boostisbetter | hahaha | 18:17 |
| kfx | my most vivid CRT memory is being proud of my 21" NEC Syncmaster... until I got an apartment on the fifth floor of the building | 18:17 |
| kfx | and I had to carry that 70-pound monstrosity up every excruciating step | 18:17 |
| Boostisbetter | Ahh NEC, and a 21" on top. Dude, you were l33t for sure with that. But yeah, 5th floor... was a good shoulder, back, and arm workout. | 18:18 |
| Boostisbetter | well legs as well, of course | 18:18 |
| kfx | I would have paid a lot of money for an elevator in that building | 18:19 |
| swivel | for a long time when print was still ubiquitous CRTs were considered the only emissive displays capable of getting anywhere close to what you'd get in the printed output, I wonder if that's still technically true but nobody cares because print is no longer the primary way content is consumed | 18:38 |
| - erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 18:40 | |
| kfx | swivel: LCDs have finally eclipsed CRTs in pixel density. my NEC would drive 2048x1536, but that's only 128 dpi, for instance | 18:53 |
| swivel | it wasn't the pixel density that was the issue at the time, reflective displays/paper have superior color precision and CRTs at the time were the best emissive display to get close to paper | 18:59 |
| kfx | weird. I'd never heard CRTs were any better at color. I know they can't reproduce cyan either | 19:02 |
| sknebel | early TFTs were quite crap, but afaik they quickly caught up, at least at the pro-levels | 19:03 |
| sknebel | I also kept a 21" Nokia CRT for quite a while until I could/wanted to afford an LCD with more pixels. tried it briefly a few years later and was surprised how I could have ever used that long-time. no clue if it had aged badly or just totally used to something different now | 19:05 |
| swivel | it was actually for a long time that my sister's ad agency continued using CRTs and scoffed at LCDs, well into maturity | 19:05 |
| swivel | keep in mind that CRTs had been around for a long time and on the high end they were quite nice | 19:06 |
| sknebel | sure, "we're used to it and it works, why risk spending lots of money on good LCDs and then find they are not good enough" and/or mess with recalibration etc are totally reasons to stick with them | 19:07 |
| swivel | it was just that they were producing print, we're talking an era where CCFLs were lighting LCD panels, their color temperature generally sucked | 19:09 |
| swivel | don't forget it was like a decade of pretty shitty displays everyone loved just because they were flat light and used less power | 19:10 |
| swivel | reclaimed desk space was nice too ;) | 19:17 |
| swivel | huh, the wikipedia page for CRTs still notes better color reproduction in CRTs over LCDs | 19:24 |
| - GNUmoon (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 19:25 | |
| + GNUmoon (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 19:25 | |
| - MajorBiscuit (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 3.4) (~MajorBisc@c-001-015-055.client.tudelft.eduvpn.nl) | 19:36 | |
| - robin (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~robin@user/terpri) | 21:11 | |
| + erlehmann (~erle@ip5f5bf491.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 21:27 | |
| - GNUmoon (QUIT: Ping timeout: 240 seconds) (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 21:38 | |
| + GNUmoon (~GNUmoon@gateway/tor-sasl/gnumoon) | 22:30 | |
| vkoskiv_ | I'm mashing X to doubt. The whole process of setting up a CRT feels... Imprecise. | 22:33 |
| vkoskiv_ | I'm sure there are industry type CRTs that are better, though. | 22:34 |
| swivel | https://www.displaymate.com/crtvslcd.html | 22:48 |
| kfx | I disagree with a lot of these | 22:56 |
| kfx | "crts are less expensive" -> maybe 20 years ago "LCDs can't show different resolutions/aspect ratios" -> an 8k LCD sure can display a LOT of resolutions and aspect ratios just by letterboxing etc | 22:57 |
| kfx | I think the document just hasn't aged well | 22:57 |
| swivel | it's possible, I was openly wondering if the color reproduction accuracy is still true today - the linked document looks like the kind of things that were true for quite a long time. | 23:42 |
| swivel | right now my impression is that oled is the most likely to be superior to crt in the color dept | 23:42 |
| swivel | i miss the amoled display of my old nokia n9 | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!