2021-06-08.log

+ reformer (~reformer@softboy.mntmn.com)00:18
- sundog (QUIT: Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat) (~sundog@207.225.227.236)00:22
+ sundog (~sundog@207.225.227.236)00:27
+ mntmn (~mntirc@softboy.mntmn.com)00:45
mntmnAsmadeus: yes, i've reverted that change, but there's a different problem that makes a lot of the crypto test fail at boot time01:03
Asmadeussorry seeing just now you quoted that mail earlier :D01:31
+ Neelfyn (uid180106@id-180106.stonehaven.irccloud.com)01:32
Asmadeusdidn't get any other problem with that, can retry today but might come down to board difference then. I need to setup a board that tests linux-next every night...01:33
- ndufresne (QUIT: Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) (~ndufresne@halloumi.collabora.co.uk)01:49
+ ndufresne (~ndufresne@halloumi.collabora.co.uk)01:50
mntmnAsmadeus: yes, i'm still bisecting. really pulling my hair out here01:51
Asmadeuscaam looks ok here (so probably something different there), but ethernet nic stopped working at some point so I'm in for some "fun" too... I'm missing the HPC cluster I could abuse for kernel bisecting at previous work :D02:50
mntmnugh03:06
mntmnbisect pointed me at a change in swiotlb but i'm skeptical03:06
mntmnhmm but 5.12-rc2 boots now without caam errors, when 16fc3cef33a04632ab6b31758abdd77563a20759 reverted03:07
mntmn(and of course 7d981405d0fd3cfc0de052e4791f516235d8b858 reverted)03:07
Asmadeus(sorry spoke too fast, I had crypto self tests turned off)03:08
mntmnoh! and?03:11
Asmadeusprobably same bunch of warnings you have03:11
mntmnaha!03:11
mntmnlike, a lot?03:11
Asmadeusquite a few yes03:11
mntmnoof ok so i don't have some kind of broken system here at least03:12
mntmnand if you revert 16fc3cef33a04632ab6b31758abdd77563a20759?03:12
mntmndo they go away?03:12
AsmadeusWas going to try but that code changed quite a bit until master, need to rebuild something older03:12
mntmnoh, i hadn't tried master... trying tag v5.12 atm03:13
mntmnyeah, works03:22
mntmnvery, very, very strange03:22
mntmntyping this on 5.12 on reform.03:24
AsmadeusI guess that means the caam code tried to map some area with an unaligned base address and that no longer flies; should be possible to figure out what now03:29
mntmnyes, makes sense, the errors also mention buffers03:34
mntmnok, finally i can go home and get some sleep (it's 3:30am)03:35
AsmadeusGet some sleep :) I'm adding a WARN_ON() if tlb_addr isn't aligned, will figure something soon03:35
mntmncool, thanks03:36
Asmadeusbingo, ctx->sh_desc_enc_dma isn't aligned in skcipher_setkey()03:38
Asmadeusgoing to be a bit of a pain to fix on the caam side, but it's actually a bug in swiotlb -- not adjusting the address is fine but in that case they should extend the requested size by this much...03:51
Asmadeusasked for opinions on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/YL7XXNOnbaDgmTB9@atmark-techno.com/05:00
- Neelfyn (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid180106@id-180106.stonehaven.irccloud.com)05:11
+ odnes (~odnes@109-178-226-140.pat.ren.cosmote.net)05:53
+ specing_ (~specing@user/specing)06:28
- specing (QUIT: Ping timeout: 272 seconds) (~specing@user/specing)06:29
* specing_ -> specing06:30
- odnes (QUIT: Ping timeout: 250 seconds) (~odnes@109-178-226-140.pat.ren.cosmote.net)07:05
+ rasmus-mk (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)07:35
- rasmus-mk (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1) (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)07:41
- artfwo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 244 seconds) (~artfwo@2a02:8109:8500:26d0:2102:10c:9212:4057)09:01
+ rasmus-mk (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)09:13
- rasmus-mk (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1) (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)09:21
- jomo (QUIT: Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) (~jomo@user/jomo)10:38
+ jomo (~jomo@user/jomo)10:39
- skalk (QUIT: Ping timeout: 252 seconds) (~skalk@vond.sysret.de)10:40
+ skalk (~skalk@vond.sysret.de)10:46
+ mjw (~mjw_@2001:1c06:2487:f800:9e5c:8eff:fe8f:a440)10:53
mntmnAsmadeus: thanks!11:43
mntmnAsmadeus: also, the nxp soc id thingie bug is a real regression... you see the swiotlb bug only after reverting that, right12:05
mntmnat least on imx8mq12:05
Asmadeusyeah I was the one who reported that quite a while ago :/12:51
Asmadeuswish they'd take it a bit more seriously but then again I probably should have insisted a bit more, kind of gave up using upstream for work (mainly because of the vivante drivers)12:51
mntmnyou're using the vivante drivers?13:49
mntmnwhy?13:49
mntmn(just curious)13:55
+ kklimonda_ (~kklimonda@cauldron.klimonda.com)16:10
- apolkosnik[m] (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~apolkosni@2001:470:69fc:105::ff7)16:53
- jryans (QUIT: Write error: Connection reset by peer) (~jryansmat@2001:470:69fc:105::1d)16:53
- cryptix (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~cryptxxma@2001:470:69fc:105::94a)16:53
- scops (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~scopstchn@2001:470:69fc:105::8da)16:53
+ jryans (~jryansmat@2001:470:69fc:105::1d)16:53
+ scops (~scopstchn@2001:470:69fc:105::8da)16:54
+ cryptix (~cryptxxma@2001:470:69fc:105::94a)16:54
+ apolkosnik[m] (~apolkosni@2001:470:69fc:105::ff7)16:54
+ rasmus-mk (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)17:11
* kklimonda_ -> kklimonda17:19
+ adjtm (~adjtm@188.26.199.251)17:33
+ reform24660 (~mntmn@p54a43433.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)17:34
reform24660just a test!17:34
mntmnok cool17:34
- reform24660 (QUIT: Client Quit) (~mntmn@p54a43433.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)17:34
+ specing_ (~specing@user/specing)18:26
- specing (QUIT: Ping timeout: 258 seconds) (~specing@user/specing)18:29
* specing_ -> specing18:29
- swivel (QUIT: *.net *.split) (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com)18:41
- TadeusTaD (QUIT: *.net *.split) (tadeustad@psifactor.pl)18:41
- jackhill (QUIT: *.net *.split) (~jackhill@kalessin.dragonsnail.net)18:41
+ jackhill_ (~jackhill@kalessin.dragonsnail.net)18:41
+ tadeus_brick (tadeustad@psifactor.pl)18:41
+ swivel (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com)18:41
- mjw (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~mjw_@2001:1c06:2487:f800:9e5c:8eff:fe8f:a440)19:10
+ artfwo (~artfwo@2a02:8109:8500:26d0:e628:2d71:34c9:e02)19:21
- artfwo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~artfwo@2a02:8109:8500:26d0:e628:2d71:34c9:e02)19:49
+ artfwo (~artfwo@2a02:8109:8500:26d0:e18b:8241:bf45:b708)20:02
flowyi wish firefox were as fast as chromium. i want to use it so badly, but every little bit of snappiness matters.20:13
flowyif you just stay away from fat web app things it doesn't matter but it's difficult to avoid entirely20:14
flowythe performance difference is noticable on reform20:14
flowy*noticeable20:15
- rasmus-mk (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1) (~rasmus@c83-253-223-217.bredband.tele2.se)21:06
* sknebel -> sgreger21:35
* sgreger -> sknebel21:36
doppleryeah :( I hate having to use both21:40
+ ephase (~ephase@2a01:e0a:168:1211:e28f:546:9a1a:1326)21:43
ex-parrotI just switched back to Firefox after a decade of Chromium, and more recently chromium built from source by me. But I ain’t got time for that fight 21:45
- S0rin (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~S0rin@82-64-116-66.subs.proxad.net)22:06
+ S0rin (~S0rin@82-64-116-66.subs.proxad.net)22:12
mntmnflowy: maybe ask the firefox team why it is so slow ;)22:26
_BnuIf you do that, they'll probably make it even slower, because no one wants that.22:32
_BnuI like FireFox, but they need to stop deleting features and ruining random things for absolutely no reason, haha.22:32
_BnuAt least they're suddenly using the "Updates available" icon for Downloads all of a sudden.22:33
ex-parrotThat’s why I switched /to/ Firefox again, keeping up with patching stuff back in to Chromium when they remove or break it is just too much 22:45
+ Neelfyn (uid180106@id-180106.stonehaven.irccloud.com)22:58
_BnuThat's not why I switched away from Chromium, but I'm sure they do the same thing.23:20
* jackhill_ -> KM4MBG23:20
* KM4MBG -> jackhill[m]23:21
* jackhill[m] -> jackhill23:21
_BnuI will not use web browsers by a company that stores your entire browsing history online. I'm not saying you shouldn't use Chrome, but that's why I refuse to use it.23:21
- mtm (QUIT: Ping timeout: 272 seconds) (~mtm@c-174-58-99-93.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)23:40
- erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 250 seconds) (~erle@dynamic-046-114-038-213.46.114.pool.telefonica.de)23:40
+ erlehmann (~erle@dynamic-046-114-033-121.46.114.pool.telefonica.de)23:52
flowy_Bnu: yeah, for sure. but in theory (i.e., trusting that settings do as they should), is it not trivial to stop chromium from doing that23:53
flowyit's a genuine question as i'm currently re-assessing my use of chrome/chromium23:54
ex-parrotEven chromium has a surprising amount of telemetry 23:58
ex-parrotThe ungoogled-chromium patch set is a good place to find out more 23:58
ex-parrotI don’t think chromium (when not configured to) sends a full fidelity stream of all your browsing back to Google but it definitely leaks more “hints” about what you’re doing than I’d like 23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!