+ oomono (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qocibqwbijtgctvs) | 00:25 | |
- Albylmannen (QUIT: Ping timeout: 246 seconds) (Berof@31-208-217-48.cust.bredband2.com) | 01:22 | |
+ Albylmannen (Berof@31-208-217-48.cust.bredband2.com) | 01:57 | |
- Albylmannen (QUIT: Client Quit) (Berof@31-208-217-48.cust.bredband2.com) | 02:00 | |
- oomono (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qocibqwbijtgctvs) | 02:32 | |
+ B[] (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 02:33 | |
+ oomono (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gvnejmoyilatnody) | 05:02 | |
- erlehmann (QUIT: Ping timeout: 240 seconds) (~erlehmann@46.114.37.207) | 05:52 | |
+ erlehmann (~erlehmann@46.114.38.21) | 06:06 | |
- B[] (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 07:56 | |
- futarisIRCcloud (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid222239@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-itwcmhwlkdkohwrc) | 08:07 | |
- oomono (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gvnejmoyilatnody) | 08:52 | |
+ B[] (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 08:58 | |
- terpri (QUIT: Ping timeout: 244 seconds) (~terpri@2606-a000-1127-83a8-29bb-d4a9-b6ca-cbc6.inf6.spectrum.com) | 09:02 | |
- dckc (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~DanC@user2.kumc.edu) | 09:33 | |
+ dckc (~DanC@2605:a601:ac60:1000:1d25:6d03:ae85:e8f8) | 09:38 | |
- B[] (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 09:55 | |
+ B[] (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 09:58 | |
+ Valkyria (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 12:05 | |
- Valkyria (QUIT: Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 12:24 | |
+ oomono (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cpjqlhuqirhjgtkt) | 12:25 | |
+ Valkyria (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 12:54 | |
lastebil | well, that was easy (: | 13:08 |
---|---|---|
lastebil | only issue was my first init script actually sort of ... tried to kill init, so I used the 'standard' runit init, and loaded the modules in rc.local | 13:09 |
lastebil | but yes, it's basically ... "untar, copy modules, and go" | 13:09 |
lastebil | and if you're me | 13:09 |
lastebil | you load my keymap (: | 13:09 |
mntmn | lastebil: cool, so you have void running incl. display? | 13:29 |
mntmn | that's awesome | 13:29 |
lastebil | pic on icosahedron (: | 13:31 |
- Valkyria (QUIT: Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 14:01 | |
mntmn | lastebil: awesome! | 14:14 |
* erlehmann -> erlehmann[m] | 15:04 | |
* erlehmann[m] -> erlehmann | 15:05 | |
- oomono (QUIT: Quit: Connection closed for inactivity) (uid328183@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-cpjqlhuqirhjgtkt) | 15:05 | |
+ futarisIRCcloud (uid222239@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-wdhvudlwdremjlqt) | 15:13 | |
lastebil | I mistakenly left out the step of copying the modules, but um, I can add that in a proper post with actual steps that is not a toot (: | 15:26 |
lastebil | back from doctor so now let's install build stuff and build that userland (: | 15:26 |
mntmn | cool!! | 15:26 |
lastebil | well, ok, updating the image from the 2019 'current' tarball (: | 15:27 |
lastebil | I'll see if devuan has a aarch64 base tarball, I think it does, and if so, I'll post 'how to do this for devuan' also. | 15:27 |
lastebil | of course could also do that for alpine but ... will leave that as an excercise for the readers (: | 15:28 |
lastebil | ok devuan doesn't have a aarch64 tarball that I see laying around in the usual place (think it's documented tho) so I work on void for now, as that's what I generally use (: | 15:30 |
erlehmann | lastebil, does this void system of you have an encrypted root filesystem? | 15:39 |
lastebil | not YET. | 15:42 |
lastebil | I _could_ do that. I opted for "let's make it work" first. | 15:42 |
lastebil | to do it I'd basically mimic mntmn's script that he's using for his. | 15:43 |
lastebil | (with some changes for, well, booting ... it... somehow. Hmm. Yes that IS a challenge. Let's see how we do that AFTER userland.) | 15:43 |
+ Valkyria (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 15:45 | |
- dckc (QUIT: Ping timeout: 260 seconds) (~DanC@2605:a601:ac60:1000:1d25:6d03:ae85:e8f8) | 15:52 | |
+ dckc (~DanC@user2.kumc.edu) | 15:56 | |
mntmn | yeah | 16:00 |
- Valkyria (QUIT: Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) (~Valkyria@85-76-97-109-nat.elisa-mobile.fi) | 16:03 | |
- B[] (QUIT: Ping timeout: 264 seconds) (~Thunderbi@219-89-228-78-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz) | 16:21 | |
lastebil | someone asked how fast it was so I'm running unixbench, I should have done that AFTER getting userland built and tested (: | 16:25 |
mntmn | haha | 16:34 |
+ wiedi (~wiedi@2a01:138:a015:15:bd0b:82fa:6a71:20e2) | 18:09 | |
- wiedi_ (QUIT: Quit: ^C) (~wiedi@ip5b4065de.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) | 18:11 | |
- swivel (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com) | 19:47 | |
+ swivel (~swivel@shells.gnugeneration.com) | 20:47 | |
+ EricShmart (~EricShmar@119-83-181-166.mobile.uscc.net) | 22:18 | |
EricShmart | I was wondering how the nitrogen8m board would compare performancewise to my old x200? | 22:28 |
EricShmart | Not that performance matters to me, just curious about what I should expect. | 22:29 |
technomancy | man I thought it was a jokey stereotype that everyone buying a reform uses a 2008 thinkpad but I guess not | 22:29 |
mntmn | hard to compare because i don't know how old thinkpads perform. | 22:30 |
swivel | never underestimate the power of good taste | 22:30 |
sbates | and a good keyboard | 22:41 |
EricShmart | I'll be back shortly with some numbers. I don't think it would be a fair test with everything open. | 22:45 |
- EricShmart (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~EricShmar@119-83-181-166.mobile.uscc.net) | 22:45 | |
+ EricShmart (~EricShmar@119-83-181-166.mobile.uscc.net) | 22:49 | |
swivel | it's not so much an old thinkpad vs. reform comparison, it's penryn era core2duo vs. imx8m, no? | 22:53 |
EricShmart | With sysbench cpu --threads=1 run, events per second: 793.15. So a single core of Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L9400 @ 1.86GHz is better than a single Cortex-A53? | 22:55 |
EricShmart | by a marginal amount | 22:56 |
swivel | isn't the x200 2.26Ghz - 2.66Ghz ? | 23:00 |
mntmn | sysbench is not a good test | 23:00 |
mntmn | (even if i did it myself for fun recently) | 23:00 |
mntmn | but i was educated by multiple people that the results are not really useful to compare anything | 23:00 |
mntmn | i think the built in 7z benchmark was pretty ok? | 23:01 |
mntmn | invocation: 7z b | 23:01 |
mntmn | also glmark2 is interesting | 23:02 |
EricShmart | I'm running a full desktop in the background, will that hurt things? | 23:03 |
mntmn | no idea, i just did a test while running on sway, also en emacs is flying around. on reform. my Tot: row is 347 1139 4038. but this is with ondemand governor | 23:05 |
mntmn | now running with performance governor... | 23:05 |
EricShmart | Tot: 184 2035 3732 | 23:07 |
mntmn | doesn't make a big difference. 349 1142 4067 | 23:07 |
mntmn | EricShmart: ok, so your single core perf is better | 23:08 |
mntmn | EricShmart: but total perf of imx8m is slightly better than your 2 cores | 23:08 |
mntmn | mind that cortex-a53 is an extremely simple/small in-order, energy-efficient core. | 23:08 |
EricShmart | That sounds pretty good to me. This runs pretty hot. | 23:08 |
EricShmart | Thank you. | 23:08 |
EricShmart | Bye! | 23:09 |
mntmn | cya | 23:09 |
- EricShmart (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~EricShmar@119-83-181-166.mobile.uscc.net) | 23:09 | |
swivel | 14nm vs 45nm | 23:26 |
mntmn | swivel: i.MX8M is 28nm | 23:35 |
mntmn | mini, nano and plus are 14nm | 23:36 |
mntmn | i think this table is pretty new https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/supporting-information/IMX8LAYERCMPR.pdf | 23:39 |
ex-parrot | this year is just barreling forwards | 23:57 |
ex-parrot | at an alarming rate | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!